Blogs

How Long The Free Pass?

By Richard Bulman posted 05-27-2009 21:11

  
Academic institutions have long leveraged their unique position as cornerstones in the public trust to exact market benefits to the financial detriment of their business partners.

In some cases this advantage may be warranted, as public money is used to support scientific advances commercially exploited by academic institutions for the betterment of the institutions, students, the communities in which they serve and the public at large.  

But much like intercollegiate athletics, the development and exploitation of university intellectual property is a big business.  A business that is unequal in its benefits and obligations.  And one that is in need of attention.

Scientific advances subsidized by tax dollars, developed using graduate researchers, advantaged through legal protections designed to disproportionately alter market risks, that result in exponential endowments suggests that perhaps a rebalancing needs to occur in this process.


1 comment
19 views

Permalink

Comments

06-02-2009 08:08

I would like to understand Richard's position in greater detail, and encourage him to identify the inequalities in the benefits and obligations to the licensees of academic innovations. I understood Richard's post to assert that large endowments at many universities are a result of academic tech transfer income - except for perhaps at most a handful of examples, I do not believe this to be so (certainly, the assertion is not supported by AUTM survey data).
I have felt more often than not that industry by and large gets favorable deals from academia, due to numerous factors, not the least of which are the early stage of the technology and technology alternatives in the marketplace. But this may be a biased perpsective that merits further study.