Blogs

March Updates From the President

By Robin Rasor posted 03-16-2011 14:32

  

Now that we have all settled back into the routines of life and office reality, I wanted to first take the time to thank you for attending the 2011 Annual Meeting.  I hope you found all the new formatting changes useful for increased partnership meetings as well as increased networking with your peers along with AUTM’s continued stellar workshops, plenaries and SIGS.  Alan Bentley and his group will be reviewing your evaluations to make further improvements to the 2012 meeting in Anaheim beginning March 14, 2012 (put on your calendars now!).  If you have not yet sent in your evaluations, please do so now so we can have a robust set of comments and suggestions.

Secondly, I wanted to give you some updates on what we plan to accomplish in the coming year.  We have heard your concerns about transparency in Board actions.  Therefore, we will post summaries of all Board meetings beginning with the 2 ½ days of meetings the Board had in Vegas (http://www.autm.net/Board_of_Directors_Meetings.htm). Second, I will endeavor to post a blog once a month to give you updates on Board activities, issues under discussion, action items and other items of note.  I encourage you to contact me directly or to directly contact other Board members if you have specific concerns, questions, issues, etc.  Please familiarize yourself with the new Board members and their portfolios at  http://www.autm.net/Board_of_Directors/5513.htm

If you did not have the stamina to listen to my opening speech, we have posted it here so that you may review our plans for the upcoming year.  I welcome your thoughts, comments and help as we move forward.  In summary, it is all about AUTM’s three pillars: advocacy, professional development and service to our members.  In the next few months, Andy Cohn and his Advocacy committee will be closely following patent reform, the i4i/Microsoft case and the Myriad/ACLU case, among others.  I am working with a small international committee considering some changes to AUTM’s Global Health Access statement; our next meeting likely will be on or near the ASTP meeting in May.  Another group is reviewing issues related to gene patenting licensing policies. 

In Professional Development, the first AUTM Asia event will be held in Beijing April 14.  Additional information on that program can be found at: http://en.bjittc.org/.  David Gulley and his group are also working on a new Leadership Forum for Advancing Discoveries to be held later this year (more information to come later).

And lastly, over the next months I plan to give you updates on a number of new initiatives under way including a new Technology Portal, a new Deals Database, and proposed new nominations and elections process.

Thank you again for your support; I look forward to serving you in the coming year.

1 comment
112 views

Permalink

Comments

04-04-2011 16:20

Hi Robin,
I was on Kathleen Denis' panel "Stop Me Before I Patent Again!" which originated in Kathleen's observation that "40% of disclosures received were filed as new patent applications in 1998 and 50% were filed in 2003, now an astonishing 60% of disclosures received are becoming new patent applications" (I believe the source here is AUTM Licensing Surveys).
Assuming these numbers are accurate, I think it would be interesting to gather information on the average number of active invention/licensing cases AUTM licensing professionals are shouldering these days, as it seems possible this average would be quite high, especially when you consider that there are only so many hours in a day. When I ran the Harvard Medical School OTL in the late '80's-early-90's, I had approximately 40 cases, and each of my staff had more. So I wonder what kind of workload licensing officers are handling these days. I think this is a subject worth exploring as it directly impacts the effectiveness of AUTM members in their jobs.
A propos of this subject, here is a link to a blog/article entitled “Teaching, research, alumni donations … and accumulating patents” written by Melba Kurman who used to be at the Cornell Center for Technology Enterprise and Commercialization (CCTEC) and now has her own consulting practice: http://triplehelixinnovation.com/teaching-research-alumni-donations-and-accumulating-patents/1393.
“The real reason that universities accumulate patents is that every year, they file for more utility patents than they execute licenses. There’s no grand conspiracy behind the practice, nor is there a particular strategy in play. It’s similar to the way people gain weight. Each year they put on a few pounds, which doesn’t seem like much, but over time, they discover that they’re 25 pounds heavier than they were in college. The same process bloats university patent portfolios when a technology transfer office files patents on inventions that haven’t yet found a licensee. If every year you file for a few extra patents for no reason other than you or the inventor believe the technology has untapped commercial potential or the administration counts patents as a performance metric or just ‘cuz you can, voila! Twenty years later, you find yourself a lot bigger than you were in your younger years. Middle-aged heft is an unintended consequence of consuming more calories than you burn. University patent accumulation is an unintended consequence of our current university technology transfer model. ”
For the avoidance of doubt, I would like to emphasize that 25 pound phenomenon cited by Melba doesn’t apply to me personally …
Sorry to go on so long, though I am surprised that I'm the first to comment on your blog, three weeks after you posted it. And ... I think perhaps future Licensing Surveys might usefully include statistics on the average number of active case AUTM members are handling.
And ... congratulations on becoming AUTM President, a post I held from 1986-88, a distinction that once again confirms the old adage that no good deed goes unpunished ...
Best,
Stephen