Blogs

Patent Reform

By Robin Rasor posted 06-15-2011 15:51

  

After six plus years it looks like we might actually see patent reform become a reality this year. As I write this, the House version of the bill is before the rules committee and is expected to be voted on by the House later this week. It’s also our understanding the Senate is likely to adjust their bill to match the House version.

As bills were presented, amendments suggested, coalition letters signed, etc. AUTM has tried to keep you updated and to offer our members an ability to give us feedback. We have at times put out a call to action and asked you to contact your legislators to speak in favor of or in opposition to a particular issue. As all of the political flurry was going on this week I was thinking about what I said to you at the Annual Meeting this past March. I told you that we would be active in advocacy and that we would do what we believed to be best for the technology transfer community, but we also need your feedback. I’d like to know if we’ve lived up to that promise. Do you find the information we send you helpful? How do you use it? We noted that some members chose to use the Director’s Forum, but it was still a comparatively few number. Are there other ways you prefer we communicate these messages to you?

I truly believe being the leader of an organization is about representing the membership, and advancing the profession. To do this well we need to hear from you, even if it’s to say everything is going just fine. This helps me and the Board stay in touch with the community and keeps us grounded to reality. So, with that please submit your comments below. Thank you.


3 comments
111 views

Permalink

Comments

06-16-2011 12:19

Not only has the communications to the general membership improved, but I am pleased that AUTM is willing to take a stand on the issues that impact us. It highlights the importance of maintaining active membership. I don't necessarily agree with the benefits of the changes in the current patent reform bill, but AUTM has done a good job in damage control. While it is my opinion that the proposed changes may still negatively impact university tech transfer, I think the impact will be minor. That is largely in part to AUTM's active involvement over the years.

06-15-2011 18:56

Robin: I agree with Kathleen that AUTM's communication has improved greatly. However, with all due respect, AUTM is still in "decide, announce, defend" mode on the patent reform issue. All of your posted links support AUTM's position. True "education" of members requires more than that. WARF's statements on policy issues have historically been prominently featured on the AUTM website. Why are there no links to Carl Gulbrandsen's letter to AUTM members regarding HR1249, as well as other statements or letters by opponents of the patent bill? If leadership is about representing membership, it is no less about informing those opinions in a fair and balanced way. Acknowledging legitimate differences of opinion, and trusting members to review those differences and make up their own minds, are true hallmarks of strong representation and strong leadership.

06-15-2011 16:17

I think that you are doing a great job communicating many difficult things. I have felt more a part of AUTM this year than I have in a long time.